Search for: "Doe v. United States Air Force et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 8:50 am
It has come to our attention that a legal colleague has authored a blog analogizing the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the Obama Administration’s health care legislation (“Obamacare”), National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:57 am
Earlier this week, Military Judge James Pohl, the presiding judge at the military commission case United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
Relatedly, the WPR letter, like the WPR, applies to certain activities of “United States Armed Forces” and does not include activities, for example, of the Central Intelligence Agency. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:36 am
Facts: This case (Lombardo et al v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
On March 7, 2022, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) filed its published opinion in Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm
Boeing Co., et al., No. 10-15284 (9th Cir. 8/2/11). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
OHIO, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A247 v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
U.S., et al. 10-778). [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:47 pm
CAAF's new opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
FPC American Victory Fund, et al., the Second Amendment Foundation, et al., and the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund provide interpretations of the amendment’s language. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
AL., 26A FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE § 5679 (1st ed.) [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
” (Croskey et al., Cal. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The cases are Coalition for Responsible Regulation Inc., et al. v. [read post]